Banner Rotate



Logo by Julian Spanos

Antitheistic. Long. Perplexing. Offensive. Whatever.

Warning: This blog does not cater to your whims. If you are offended, then I am not obliged to care. It ain't personal until otherwise stated.

Random Quotes

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Religious pride - hell no! Disgusting arrogance - OH HELL YEAH!

The following is an article that’s currently in the editor’s inbox of an undisclosed source (don't get me started on it, we just have to do things this way):

A JOURNEY OF THOUSAND MILE MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP A PERFECT ROLE MODEL To practice and see our future and present clearly and effectively we should take lesson from our past. Thousands of people have passed in this world and contributed a lot in making human life better but prophets are considered to be the greatest of all. According to our knowledge Allah have sent 1,24000 prophets and amongst them Muhammad (PBUH) was the last prophet. All those prophets were sent for the particular period, for particular purpose and for particular people, every messenger was sent from Allah as a preacher, Warner, a bringer of good news but there is no one who combines these qualities predominantly. The person must have four qualities in order to be ideal and a model for others. The life history of person must be authentic Completeness of life history in every aspect of life It must be comprehensive It must be practical and practicable If we take examples from history, Buddhism, Hindus, Zoroater and Confucius, there life histories are full of contradictions and conflicts, all claimed to be the oldest in the history and admired by millions of followers, failed to give any practical examples and their lives are unauthentic and not more than a fiction, no kind of description about relations, ways of living is found. Even when we take example of Prophets, the best known of prophets is mosses and then Jesus Christ. There are certain events in Quran, which tells us about these two personalities, there origin, birth qualities but again the information is very minute and has changed with the passage of time we only come to know about their specific part of personality. In order to follow a noble principle we need practical examples. Muhammad (PBUH) personality was made an ideal combining thee best qualities of human being to the degree of perfection, his life history is well preserved even the smallest detail from his birth to death, we cannot modify or change them. Mohammad (PBUH) life give us a complete account about relations, how to interact with family, ? What are mother, sister, wife, and brother? What kind of relations should exist between them? He provides us all the examples of leading a simple life, helping needy and poor, hospitality, forgiveness and kindness. He first practices all these principles in his life and then makes them practicable for others. In short he was a complete personality and sent for the universe and his teachings are still alive and in practice. There is no one in the world who can claim to be as great as our holy prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was.
SAMINA SHAHEEN

All right! Nothing better than starting your day with a whole page of whole-grain STUPID!

Mind you, many people can say a substantial bit about Islam's roots as well; even backing the claims with perfect citations. Therefore, you must keep in mind, post-modern thought will always be subjective for self-service and nothing else.

You and the Muslim elites can salvage a substantial bit of inconsistent facts. However, you cannot overthrow the fact that most of these other faiths, are doing relatively fine. History doesn't matter, the application matters more; and the final product matters most. We can learn a bit from history, but revelling in it like some magic trick over a century old, is not going to make reality any more or less acceptable.

Fact: Nothing is consistent, NOT EVEN ISLAM! GET OVER IT!

Fact: Your attacks on other faiths, are actually not substantial! Of course, the fact that it isn't cited is an additional prong; but hey, feel free to shoot your own thesis in the foot before making a public spectacle of yourself. (Mind you, any of the ghosts that read this shit: the quoted article is the mindset of the average, educated, and moderate youngster from the nation of Pakistan, which prides itself on a lost sense of modernity--pathetic, isn’t it.)

Fact: Accepting a faith should not be based on how 'organised' it may appear, but rather, how much YOU can accept its attitude and accommodation towards modern issues of humanism. Part of the brilliance of the human mind that your so called 'God' forged, was its cogency and sensitivity towards higher moral-progression--an intricate ability to adapt with the changing times, and to change in it self. Such is the beauty of evolution; both physical, and psychological. Of course, I’d just be committing a vasectomy blind-folded, trying to hammer this post-modern logic into the skull of an educated Paki (Pansy).

Only fact that I could give a rat's jism about: At the end of all the baseless rants, you still have a world plagued with inhumane atrocities, sparked by the bigotry that is created by such hate-breeding, one-track segregation and school of thought! Yeah, so I guess, the ends ridicule the means; now let us all laugh! C'mon!

- "Oh my god's weiner is bigger than your god's! Hah! Hah! Hah! Die, BITCH!"
- "Hey wait a second, you fool! We were supposed to be prospering as a single grand race!"
- "Yeah? Well fuck you! You insulted my pride! Now I must stone your sista'!"
- "Oh yeah? Well I'll stone your motha'!"
[AN ALL OUT EXHIBIT OF VIOLENT STUPIDITY ENSUES]


A question does come up though: Do these feeble Muslim elitists realise that perhaps their arrogance is starting to burn thin; the patience of many alien sects? Who’d know? Perhaps the whole smoke screen of following a model human being has pretty much sent these drones into a dementia of parodic arrogance and worship. Meanwhile, the potential observers are offended by the rather condescending religious exhibit; effectively driven to swearing off giving this religion any sympathy. Well, it has already been established how the general, modern Moslem-dolt can unwittingly shoot his/her own point in the foot. Perhaps we should conduct a fundraiser to have these so-called educated youngsters of the Moslem world sent to vocational Public Relations classes.

"Never alienate a potential client with a condescending tone, you dumb fuck!"


This concatenation of facts that the Koran thumpers keep tossing our way, is also getting rather tiresome. Are people sitting here and waiting to be mystified by some magical Houdini show? Are they truly as open to abrogating their conscience and moral centre at the sight of some magical trick? What makes an individual strong? Their ability to stand by their personal convictions or their natural insecurity and willingness to virtually sell-out to the next “big thing?” It’s pathetic how the book thumpers keep throwing prophecies and other various facts from the books, trying to win over a debate or an argument, realising little that perhaps the other party doesn’t care how ‘correct’ the source may be, but rather, how much they find themselves compatible with it. It is that solipsistic attitude, arrogance, and stance, that separates an individual, an enlightened thinker; from a mere impressionable advanced being, eager to follow a set of instructions as opposed to analysing and customising them. This individual arrogance, threatens the neurosis of the dysfunctional group dynamic, which is often found in the form of general collectivism in cults and religious groups. Hence why they exude such a disgusting group conscience, virtually imposing it as a collective arrogance, and denial.

“So you say that your book said some shit that was correct about five-hundred-years ago? Does that justify the thousands of wrongs that are stemming from that very book in the present day? You’re not even worthy of being called stupid! Please, just fuck off!”


Our passionate, yet aggravating columnist above, pretty much exudes the same ‘collective’ arrogance; this is also seen generally in Moslems: even the most docile of the pack can dare to exude such an attitude. Using the same argument, which many could use -against- Mohammad; she pretty much downplays a number of other creeds and groups, for lacking consistency in the past. Could it be proposed that our crack addict err… columnist here, lacks awareness of the current world and affairs? Not quite. These people are aware of what goes on, but they seem to forget that most of the atrocities being committed today, are being committed in the name of the so called “consistent” pacifist, known as Mohammad. The columnist, much like a majority of her group members, is not ignorant to what’s happening in the world, but rather: ignorant to the irony of how so much wrong is culminating in the name of reserved pacifism; even the arrogance in her passionate article serves to reinforce the wrongful alienation and bigotry that’s being bred, and one that’s now having a whip-lash effect on the Muslims. Yet they still revel on the same mantra of how their prophecies are supposedly ‘accurate’, which should be reason enough to justify all the wrongs in the world, and dignify the disgusting arrogance in their stance.

“These dumb fucks actually think that prancing about like morons, and then believing themselves to be better, will actually convert people, and gain their positive trust--how fuckin’ stupid!”


Returning once again to the legislation of this ‘justification’: the implications of the ‘accurate’ prophecies; one would question: Is this reason enough for the world to immediately abandon all direction; get down on its knees, and bend over to get divinely sodomised? “Yeah, give it to me in the ass, you burly hunk of immortal god, you!” Even though right and wrong is a relative question for the sublimed, usually contingent on the higher plane, one can no longer overrule the power and essence of modern-day humanism and awareness. Once again, referring to my past entry, I would present the rhetoric of agnostics and atheists being a generally passive group of individuals; sensitive and aware of humanistic issues; some even tolerant and sympathetic towards the struggling of the third-world religions. So, should they all simply abandon and bow down? Should they take away the one thing sacred to their sense of being: their individuality? The answer is rather obvious and bluntly viable: a firm, and stern, NO! See, in the modern world of critical thinking, we actually put greatest stock in our own consciousness: our commitment to our individual convictions make us relevant. If anything’s keeping the sympathy, and progressive understanding going, it’s the individual thought, conscience, and the post-modern subjectivity, which many are open to. Human’s have successfully evolved to a plane where they can evaluate their own compatibility and acceptance of a religion, as opposed to being shallow individuals that would feel more secure NOT relying on their personal awareness and compass of morality.

“Hell, if it weren’t for those damn agnostics, atheists and humanists! We wouldn’t have morons in our society, willing to cut those Moslems a break!”


All the creeds, and sects, especially the Christians and the Moslems, can wave their hands in the air--waving the alliterating and somewhat aging relevance and prophecies of their texts. However, these aging archaic paper words, can no longer justify and change the faces of alienation, bigotry, and inhumane atrocities that are currently consuming this planet. They have the audacity to consider those that follow no organised school of thought: a lost and misguided group; while ironically, it is only the non-organised, and modern thinkers, who seem to have a passive and less opinionated: and thus, progressive stance towards the growth and evolution of the race. What would one expect? We’re now in a world, which is exceedingly overpopulated, with a wide variety of faiths in practice.

Therefore, the prophecies and magic tricks matter no more towards insuring the progression of the collective population together, because were they to be left to their black and white ideology of being on the right side, they’d pretty much ignite a new dark age of brooding conflict, which we’re seeing unfold in part at the hands of the neo-cons and the eastern extremists. Leave them by themselves, and they’ll move from making mere derogatory comments about other cultures and practices, such as our columnist above, into mass genocide and slaughter. After all, let us not forget, this is basically how Jihad moves from words, to all-out physical assault. Even though our columnist is using mere words to exude the eloquent arrogance of her group, we can still find a bitter connotation of bigotry between each of those lines. The same obsessions with the accuracy of some history, or some book, to justify and establish authenticity in modern day and thought.

It’s no longer about which book has the most accurate of prophecies, but rather, which book can offer and instil the most progressive; tolerant; and evolutionary thought process. A trait, which unfortunately, in principle; contradicts most of the vitriolic dogma that a majority of the mainstream religions are acclimatised to. So the option comes with personal ability, and courage to step out of the subliminal security of some creed, and dare to evaluate and consider the world from a truly individual stand point: the essence of human progression--critical thought.

The human race, despite its flaws, is now well ahead of the times where faiths made people who they are. Because in the enlightened paradigm, it's the PEOPLE who make the faith what it is. Don’t believe me? Just watch -any- news channel for a brief twenty minutes, and you’ll see the glaring implication of how individual actions determine the face of ideals. If an individual, with a solid moral conscience cannot accept a given faith, and chooses to pick up another, or none at all, then that person is far more aware and sensitive than one who blindly desires for a book and relatively 'shaded' history to dictate and discretely guide him/her from solipsism into a pure digressive tenet of serving as a blind cog in a vile breed of despotism.

“I can’t spend time actually thinking, so I’ll let text and others do that for me, and then commit my own conscience for the sake of that thinking! Aren’t I the dumbest one next to dumb and dumber!”


It is a pitiful sight: watching the metamorphosis of the so-called “Islamic Pride” degenerate into a derogatory complex of self-elevation. When one can’t come to terms with their own wrongs, and perhaps misfortunes, then one goes to tear away, and attack others just to attain the small momentary satisfaction of being “better,” which is clearly a temporary fix followed by a miserable denial, and then a dark realisation. It’s high time that this faulty pride be laid to rest, because it certainly comes out as mere arrogance to the external observers--it's not helping the Moslem stance, really.

Buddhism is not admired for some cheap cheesy “self-orchestrated” consistency in history; it is admired for having a vantage that evades most of these arrogant scumbags. It is admired for having a bloody track record, which interestingly enough, is not NEARLY as bloody as most of the famous faith-based track records in general world history. It also stems from the fact that its people are relatively passive, humble, and void of the blind and offensive arrogance, which was exuded in the above quoted article. As already stated, the enlightened mind has now evolved well past the point, where it blindly desires direction from the best “tricks” in the hat; it is now at a new point there it desires to represent a faith that best reflects its own humble take on ideals. Buddhism is reputed, because it’s flexible enough when it comes to its means; adaptive; all in lieu of a healthy and progressive end! The others could glean a lot from it rather than that fanatic nerve tingling at the bottom of their spine from the stench of their anus!

Personal Notes:
“Oh we have consistent history! So bow to bitterness, arrogance, sterility, and most of all, global chaos!”
- I think I’ve found another breed of individuals that I almost hate as much as the fanatics.

“There is no one in the world who can claim to be as great as our holy prophet Muhammad.” - Sameena Shaheen.
- One would not know whether to contend that fact, however, one could come up with another deduction. There’s hardly anyone, who could claim to be more arrogant, and a blindly partisan fool, than you! The author of the quoted article! There is no one who could claim to being a dumber bitch than you, you dumb bitch!

Yeah, I think I've found the contempt earning tier after extreme fascism! Yes, I fuckin' hate linear, baseless, fuckin' shit for intelligence backed arrogance! "DUH! MY HOLY DICK'S BIGGER THAN YOURS! KNEEL BEFORE ME, FEEBLE FUCK!"

Stay cool, fuckers.

Cheers,
Kade

No comments: